The first Bristol
Festival of Economics concluded yesterday with three panel discussions
consisting of academic economists, practitioners of economics, and challengers
to the subject. Including Friday’s opening session,
the 450-capacity hall at At-Bristol was packed to the rafters each time,
showing that there is huge disquiet for the current situation. Which was backed
up by most of the questions coming from the floor.
While several people
noted that the idea of a ‘festival’ of economics sounded like something of an
oxymoron, it was refreshing to see language used so effectively to challenge
our conceptions about economics. The festival was such a success that Bristol Festival of Ideas, who organised the event, has announced it will become an annual event.
--
Panel One: People,
Places and Poverty
Chairperson Julia
Unwin is the chief executive of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation and the Joseph
Rowntree Housing Trust.
“On Monday, the Joseph
Rowntree Foundation will publish its annual state of the nation report. But the
top line information is that the number of people working and poor now
outstrips the number of people not working and poor.”
Geoff Andrews is a
lecturer in politics and an author.
“It’s striking how
much poverty is still talked about as a matter of individual choice. The
history of housing policy in Britain is a history of betrayal. A lot of people
have been left behind.
“Food banks will feed
200,000 people over the next year – which is up from 26,000 people four years
ago. Slow food offers us a way out
in this time of austerity. It’s an opportunity to examine the way we live in a
much broader sense. Poverty is not here with us to stay, but we should think
about what it means for us to be part of a community.”
Paul Gregg is a
professor of economic and social policy.
“Pensioner poverty is
in decline. Older people are further up the income distribution than they were.
They’ve been replaced by families with children. For the last decade we have
not been seeing rising real wages. Women’s earnings are now central to keeping
families afloat – their wages are rising slowly, and more than men’s wages
are.”
Lynsey Hanley is an
author.
“Food is one of the
strongest indicators of how living in poverty affects people at a psychological
and medical level. In 2007, the housing crisis was that we weren’t building
fast enough, and were only building one and two bedroom flats. There are
50-75,000 houses a year being built, but that’s a drop in the ocean of what’s
needed. We’re now facing the consequences of two decades of political
indecision.”
Paul Johnson is the
director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies.
“In 2010 we saw the
biggest fall in average incomes in this country. It was a fall in real living
standards. O% is the probability of this government meeting child poverty targets
as incomes are not rising. We have become much more of a welfare state over the
last 30 years. We are living in unbelievably extraordinary times. £120bn is the
deficit from the cuts. 2010 was the year inequality fell by more than any other
year in recent history. Working age people are now more in poverty than
pensioners.
“The richest 1% of
income tax payers are paying 30% of all income tax.”
--
Panel Two: What Next
for Britain’s Economy?
Chairperson Heather
Stewart is economics editor at The Observer.
“How do we rebuild an
economy reliant on consumer spending? How do we build something sustainable for
the long term?”
Andrew Sentance is a
senior economic adviser at Pricewaterhouse Cooper.
“There has been slow growth
around 1% but it hasn’t always been clear to people that there is growth.
Employment has held up throughout the recession following the financial crisis.
Unemployment rate has stuck at 8%, which is obviously higher than we’d like.
Inflation was meant to stay at 2% but since 2006 it has been considerably
higher.
“The problem with the
economy is not just a lack of demand, but with adjusting to a significantly
changed economic order. We’re in a new normal of disappointing growth and
volatility in economic prices.
“In the long-term I’m
optimistic that western economies will get back to a growth phase. But trying
to predict what will drive the next wave of growth is very difficult.”
Peter Marsh is
manufacturing editor at the Financial Times and an author.
“Bristol has a great
manufacturing heritage and a lot of interesting things going on. In Britain
there is much more manufacturing happening than people think. We’re now number
nine in the world for manufacturing, which is a 2.5% world share.”
Vicky Pryce is a
senior managing director at FTI Consulting Inc and an author.
“It is impossible for
a small island to keep growing at the rate it has been. Next year is forecast at
0.1% growth, which means more recession. My message is to rethink how you spend
the money you raise, and perhaps raise more because the government can borrow
cheaply. Spend on infrastructure and housing.”
--
Panel Three: Economics
in Crisis
Chairperson Richard
Marshall is editor of 3am.
“It’s intimidating
sitting here with four people with brains the size of planets, three of whom are
women.”
Diane Coyle, author
and programmer of this festival.
“There are two types
of economists, macro and micro. Micro economists are individuals making
decisions, making rational decisions about what to do. Macro economists are
when you add everything together as a whole. The crisis is worse for macro
economists who didn’t see it coming at all.”
Bridget Rosewell is from
Volterra Partners.
“Is economics more
like history or physics? Does politics affect the kind of history you do?
Physics is about explaining, and when you can predict and can have a good
explanation. I don’t think we should be too depressed about the state of the
economy, even if we’re depressed about economists.”
Carol Propper is a
professor in economics.
“I question when is
the optimal time to invest in children, because studies into early child
investment have shown that this pays off. Healthcare takes about 10% of the
GDP. There’s a government economic service, but not a government sociological or
psychological service – even though these would be useful.”
Aditya Chakrobortty is
economics leader writer at The Guardian.
“If you ask economists
why nobody saw it coming, some say they got too carried away with their own
models – which were better than reality. I don’t buy that. Their models didn’t
recognise the possibility this might happen.
“No academic
discipline has shaped British society as much as economics. Economists have
cheerleaded the kind of economy you’ve now got. And it will take well into 2020
before the average family in Britain is earning in real terms what they were in
2002. You’re in a crisis and nobody that I can see has the confidence, depth of
study or willingness to enter into the fray.”